Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Imran Khan supported Musharraf The Story

Pakistani cricket legend-turned government official Imran Khan on Tuesday sponsored the choice to be held one month from now to choose the eventual fate of President Pervez Musharraf yet his juvenile Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf set out toward inconvenience as a portion of its pioneers have contradicted it transparently. After extensive vacillating, Imran Khan pronounced that his gathering has chosen to help Musharraf's choice. In an announcement issued from Karachi, Imran said he has chosen to help the submission as he trusted that Musharraf needed "to make Pakistan a cutting edge Islamic, welfare state". Imran said his gathering needs to assume its genuine job as "we want that vote based system is advanced in the nation and a spotless initiative go to the fore". Imran propelled his gathering with a ton of pomp in the last broad decisions however wound up in an extraordinary dissatisfaction after he neglected to win a solitary seat despite the fact that he himself challenged 22 seats from various districts.


A severe commentator of previous Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, Imran asserted that legislators in the nation printed cash through debasement amid the most recent 12 years. The choice has been restricted by all the major ideological groups including Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party, (PPP) and Sharif's Pakistan Muslim class (PML). While Imran reported the help to the submission, a segment of his gathering headed by General Secretary Miraj Muhammad Khan transparently restricted the gathering choice to back it. Pakistan Daily cited a gathering sources as saying that Miraj was harshly incredulous of the gathering tolerating the "undemocratic" move of Musharraf attempting to get chose for a multi year term through a choice.

Pakistan Tehreek-I-Insaf boss Imran Khan has hailed the SC decision on the Oct 12 change and said that it will furnish the present government with a component of authenticity. Mr Khan said the administration should begin the usage of the seven-point motivation. He said it should offer need to the responsibility procedure. It ought to pronounce making of choice required for each voter and embrace other required constituent changes to debilitate the decision of degenerate components for parliamentary openings. He said the legislature should likewise set a point of confinement for race consumption. In a Press articulation issued on Friday, he said after the declaration of the SC decision the legislature would never again have the capacity to give weak reasons to the general population who were sitting tight for positive outcomes. He said the administration ought to have a vote of open certainty straightforwardly through a submission not long after the takeover. However at this point the routine ought to satisfy its guarantees immediately and work as per open desires as it has been given a time of three years for this reason by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Sunday, March 24, 2019

Should we Ban Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan?

Jamaat-e-Islami and there Deep Roots in spreading Hatred in Pakistan



.The Idea of Pakistan was Given by Sir Allama Iqbal and was Implemented by Quaid Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
The Jamaat-e-Islami never supported The Idea of Creation of Pakistan Firstly They attacked the Secular Ideology of The New-State as desired by the Founder,


They used to call Quaid-Azam as Kafir Azam.They opposed the Creation of Pakistan but once the New Nation was born They become its Self Custodian by Threatening its Core Policy and Turning into a Fascist Party.


There Hatred towards The Ahmadi Minorities is not a New Phenomena.They Opposed The Great Foreign Minister Sir Zafarullah Khan due to His Association and Acceptance of the Ahmadi Community.
The Foreign Minister Sir Zafarullah khan is Highly esteemed by The Saudis as well as Palestine.This is very Interesting that Jamaat-e-islami draws its major Funding from Saudi Arabia.


The Nation was going very Well and Ayub Khan was the First person to realize there double standards and He Arrested Jamaat-e-Islami Founder Maulana Abul Ala Maududi and sentenced him to Death which was revoked under Pressure from Saudi Arabia.
Then Jamaat islami associated itself with The Notorious Yahya Khan and They made him as Hero and Saviour of Islam.
The Role of Jamaat-e-Islami in East Pakistan now Bangladesh is very Bad.They Formed the Notorious Al-Shams and Al-Badr which did a Lot of Atrocities which resulted in a Bad Image of The Military.
Bangladesh also become a Role Model once they Cracked on Jamaat-e-Islami and sentenced Them to Death.

The Notorious Branch of Jamaat-e-Islami Student Wing is another Branch that does not Allow Basant and Mix Gatherings and Valentine Days.
There Goons have Killed Thousands of People in Pakistan.
All Corrupt Leaders come from Jamaat The Prominent are Hussain Haqqani and Javed Hashmi.
The Bottom Line is if Pakistan has to become Secular Modern State they Must Ban Jamaat-e-Islami


Sunday, March 17, 2019

Sikh Heritage Pakistan

Nawaz Sharif:25 Images HD from Nawaz Sharif in Power

 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif saluting fr. back seat of auto, riding w. his (unident.) aide de camp
 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif (L) conferring w. his (unident.) aide de camp (ADC), leaving PM's residence.
 PM Nawaz Sharif on grounds of PM's residence during TIME interview (

 ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: Sacked Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (R) watches President Ghulam Ishaq Khan's speech as his former minister Sardar Mehtab Abbasi looks on at prime minister house 19 April 1993. Khan dismissed Sharif accusing him of nepotism, mismanagement and corruption.
 Pakistani PM Mian Nawaz Sharif (C) conferring w. (prob.) aides at PM's official residence
 Former Chief Min. of Punjab Nawaz Sharif (C) & others during ceremony marking 2nd anniv. of Pres. Zia ul Haq's death in plane crash.
 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif addressing Natl. Assembly.
 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif (C) mtg. w. religious & political ldrs., seated beneath portrait of nation's founder Jinnah
 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif (L) conferring w. hovering secy-type aide, pursuing papers at his desk.
 PM Mian Nawaz Sharif shaking hands w. Afghan Hezb-i-Islami Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (R) during mtg. w. mujahedin ldrs.
 Ex-Punjab Chief Min. Mian Nawaz Sharif, Islamic People's Party ldr., (C) riding in open sun roofed car during IJI election campaign in Punjab
 Ex-Punjab Chief Min. IJI ldr. Mian Nawaz Sharif (L) riding in open car w. PM Jatoi, during Islamic Dem. Alliance election campaign

 ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: Afghan leaders (sitting), along with representatives of several Islamic countries, pray after the signing ceremony for an Afghan peace agreement 07 March 1993 in Islamabad. Front row, from left: Afghan warlord and leader of fundamentalist Hezb-i-Islami (Islamic Party) Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, leader of the Jamiat-i-Islami (Islamic Society) party, and Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, head of the Jabah Mahaz-e-Milli party. Back row, from left: Pakistan Foreign Minister Siddique Kanjo, Aladdin Borujerd, Iranian deputy foreign minister, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia intelligence chief, and Afghan Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Najibullah Lafrai.


 ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (R) welcomes 04 March 1993 at his residence in Islamabad Karim Khalili (L), Shiite Afghan Muslim who heads the Hizb-i-Wahdat (United Party) while former Afghan president Sibghatullah Mojaddedi (C), a moderate Afghan politician, looks on, during the Afghan peace talks. Khalili took over the reigns of the faction in 1995, after the Taliban murdered Shiite leader Abdul Ali Mazari in Kabul. He quickly earned a reputation as a pragmatic moderate keen to stake claim to power for Sunni-dominated Afghanistan's Shiites. Wahdat claims the Hazara community represents around 15-20 percent of Afghans.

FRANCE - JANUARY 01: Nawaz Sharif In Paris On January 15th 1992\
 FRANCE - JANUARY 15: Nawaz Sharif In Paris On January 15th 1992 
 Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani (L), leader of the Jamiat-i-Islami (Islamic Society) party, shakes hands with Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, 02 March 1993 at Sharif's residence in Islamabad, prior the second round of the Afghan peace talks.
 TEHRAN, IRAN - MARCH 13: Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, Pakistani President Nawaz Sharif and Iranian President Hashemi Rafsanjani during a meeting on peace-building on March 13, 1993 in Tehran, Afghanistan
 Pakistan politician Nawaz Sharif speaks to the audience during the 1993 Parliamentary elections in Pakistan
 Nawaz Sharif, leader of the Islami Jamhoori Ittehad or Islamic Democratic Alliance (IJI or IDA), campaigning in the run-up to the Pakistani General Election, Pattoki, Pakistan, 13-14th October 1990.
 Nawaz Sharif, leader of the Islami Jamhoori Ittehad or Islamic Democratic Alliance (IJI or IDA), speaking at the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, following his victory in the Pakistani General Election, Pakistan, 26th October 1990
TOKYO, JAPAN - DECEMBER 17: (CHINA OUT, SOUTH KOREA OUT) Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Japanese Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa shake hands prior to their meeting at the prime minister's official residence on December 17, 1992 in Tokyo, Japan. (

Saturday, March 16, 2019

اپوزیشن لیڈر حمزہ شہباز شریف کا پنجاب اسمبلی میں تنخواہوں پر اضافے پر تنقید

اپوزیشن لیڈر حمزہ شہباز شریف کا پنجاب اسمبلی میں تنخواہوں پر اضافے پر تنقید

 جناب شہباز شریف جو رمضان شوگر کیس میں احتساب عدالت میں پیش ھونے آئے پیشی کے بعد صحافیوں سے گفتگو میں فرمایا گورنمنٹ گیس بجلی کے بل بڑھا رھی ھے لیکن فنڈز نا ھونے کے باوجود پنجاب اسمبلی میں تنخواہوں میں 
اضافی وزیراعلی کا گھر جیسے منصوبے پاس کر رھی ھے یے سخت قابل مزمت ھے


 یہاں یے سوال بنتا ھے کیا پی ایم ایل این اپنے ممبران کو پابند کرے کے وہ انکار کریں

اضافی تنخواہوں پر کیا پی ایم ایل نواز نے اسمبلی میں اس کے خلاف آواز اٹھائی 


جب آپ کے اراکین کچھ نھیں بولے تو اب واویلا کیوں

 ان کے بقول جب حالت صحیح ھو تو ایسا کرنے میں کوئی حرج نھیں

\ موصوف سے پوچھا جائے کے جب آپ اپنے دور کو سنہرا دور کہتے ھیں تو آپ نے کیوں ان کی تنخواہیں نا بڑھائیں شور ڈالیں لیکن دلیل سے 

\عوام کو احمق سمجھنا چھوڑ دیں









The Dream That Became A Nightmare


WAY BACK IN 1979: Some foreign observers thought in 1979 that traditionalism was no longer a strong force in Saudi Arabia. This idea was disproved when at least 500 dissidents invaded and seized the Grand Mosque in Mecca on November 20, 1979. The leader of the dissidents, Juhaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Saif al Utaibi, a Sunni, was from one of the foremost families of Najd. His grandfather had ridden with Abd al Aziz in the early decades of the century, and other family members were among the foremost of the Ikhwan. Juhaiman said that his justification was that the Al Saud had lost its legitimacy through corruption, ostentation, and mindless imitation of the West--virtually an echo of his grandfather's charge in 1921 against Abd al Aziz. Juhaiman accusations against the Saudi monarchy closely resembled Ayatollah Ruhollah Musavi, Khomeini's diatribes against the shah. The Saudi leadership was stunned and initially paralyzed by the takeover. The Grand Mosque surrounds the Kaaba, symbol of the oneness of God and believed by Muslims to have been built by the Prophet Abraham. The courtyard is one of the sites where the hajj, the fifth pillar of Islam, is enacted. Because of the holiness of the place, no non-Muslims may enter the city of Mecca. Furthermore, all holy places come under a special injunction in Islam. It is forbidden to shed blood there or to deface or to pollute them in any way. Despite careful planning on Juhaiman part, a guard was shot dead by one of the nervous dissidents. Such a desecration is a major violation under Islamic law and merits crucifixion for the convicted offender. Juhaiman party included women as well as men, other peninsular Arabs, and a few Egyptians. A score of the dissidents were unemployed graduates of the kingdom's seminary in Medina. They had provisions for the siege they expected as well as extensive supplies of arms. The government's initial attempts to rout the dissidents were stymied. Before any military move could be authorized, the ulama had to issue a dispensation to allow the bearing of arms in a holy place. When the religious problems were solved by announcement of the ulama's ruling, logistical problems bogged down the efforts of the military and the national guard for several days. Finally, two weeks later the military effort succeeded, and the dissidents were dislodged. All the surviving males were eventually beheaded in the squares of four Saudi cities. 

Turning back to the Siege of Mecca in 1979 when Juhayman al-Otaibi and his followers stormed Mecca. It becomes clear that this galvanized America and Saudi Arabia to further bankroll Sunni Islamic terrorists in Afghanistan and bordering regions of Pakistan. After all, the elites in Saudi Arabia needed a distraction and America was worried about the repercussions of this extremely important event. The year 1979 in the Islamic world was dramatic and this applies to the Iranian Revolution, the Soviet Union entering Afghanistan, and the Siege of Mecca in Saudi Arabia. However, the greater event was the Siege of Mecca because for America and Saudi Arabia the crisis in Afghanistan was a welcome distraction. Therefore, funding Sunni Islamic terrorism was a great way to take the “heat” of elites within Saudi Arabia and to unify Sunni Islamists into their version of an Islamic jihad. At the same time, it is also clear that the Islamic ulema violated the words of the prophet Mohammed because killing is forbidden in the Grand Mosque. However, the Islamic ulema supported the attack against the jihadists and Saudi units, the French National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN), CIA operatives who were involved in the planning, and other covert security agencies, stormed the Grand Mosque and killed hundreds of Sunni jihadists. The true extent of the attack was hidden in general from the outside world but the repercussions remain powerful today. In an earlier article published by Modern Tokyo Times it was stated that “The Saudi Arabian regime in 1979 faced a major crisis because the siege of Mecca could have led to severe pressure on the House of Saud. Therefore, the regime turned to America in order to crush the uprising. CIA operatives were sent to help.” Ziauddin Sardar states in his article called “The battle at Islam’s heart” (1 November 2007 – The New Statesman) that “A horde of CIA operatives was quickly converted to Islam so that they could enter the Holy City to assess the battlefield for themselves. They recommended chemical warfare.” Therefore, the French GIGN which is a specialist counter-terrorism unit and which is trained in hostage taking events, alongside CIA operatives, were converted to Islam with the blessing of political elites in both America and France. The conversions lacked sincerity and is clear evidence that the House of Saud, the Islamic ulema in Saudi Arabia, the slave mentality of America and France which would do anything for the monarchy, all worked hand in hand. Irrespective if individuals agree with crushing the jihadist uprising, it is clear that individuals like Osama bin Laden would understand this event from “an Islamic point of view” and this applies to violating the Grand Mosque of Mecca. The trade-off between the Saudi regime and the religious leaders of Saudi Arabia was that they would be allowed to do whatever they liked apart from threatening the ruling elites. Therefore, terrorism in “not our backyard” was implemented and radical organizations were allowed to spread their ideology throughout the world and clearly with great success. Ziauddin Sardar further comments that “Thus began, on the morning of 20 November 1979, the Siege of the Sacred Mosque. What happened during the next two weeks has had a profound impact on most of the Muslim world.” He continues by stating that “The insurgents were led by a Bedouin preacher, Juhayman bin Seif al-Uteybi, and his brother- in-law Mohammed Abdullah al-Qahtani, the alleged Mahdi. The rebels included Egyptians, Pakistanis and American converts, but most were Saudis from the Oteiba tribe, which had actually helped King Abdul Aziz, founder of Saudi Arabia, to seize control of the Arabian Peninsula in 1902. They believed that the royal family had become corrupt, that the state was promoting heresy, that religious scholars were collaborating with the royal family in spreading immoral practices and that Saudi Arabia had become obsessed with money and consumerism. I knew their kind rather well.” It was also reported that you had a connection with the bin Laden family because “In the 1960s Osama bin Laden’s half-brother Mahrous bin Laden joined a rebel group opposed to the Saudi government. With his assistance, in 1979 the rebels smuggled weapons into Mecca using trucks belonging to the bin Laden family company. Five hundred rebels then seized the Grand Mosque in Mecca (sic), Islam’s holiest mosque in its holiest city. They try, but fail, to overthrow the Saudi royal family. All the men who took part are later beheaded except Mahrous. Eventually he is released from prison because of the close ties between the bin Ladens and the Saudi royal family. Mahrous apparently abandons the rebel cause and joins the family business. He is eventually made a head of the Medina branch and a member of the board. He will still hold these positions on 9/11. But a newspaper reports that “his past [is] not forgiven and most important decisions in the [bin Laden family business] are made without Mahrous’ input.” (Collection of sources – Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 10/7/21; Ha’aretz ,12/18/2002; and New Yorker, 11/5/2001) Juhayman al-Otaibi was a powerful leader despite the lack of followers who supported his logic. He believed firmly that the House of Saud was polluting Islam and that materialism was destroying the fabric of society alongside other important factors. Therefore, he and his followers stormed Mecca in order to challenge the ruling elites and this event led to shockwaves within the Sunni Islamic community. Over two weeks you had an Islamic jihad against the Saudi regime and hundreds of Islamists were killed by a mixture of forces. Mecca had become a battleground and a place full of blood and devastation. Accounts vary about the forces which were instrumental in protecting the House of Saud but America, France, and Pakistan played their role and the CIA gave powerful support. Shortly afterwards, Afghanistan would become a rallying call in spreading radical Sunni Islam and clearly America had a shared objective with the House of Saud. Therefore, “several birds could be killed with one stone.” This applies to a much needed distraction for Saudi Arabia; the need to retake the mantle of being the guardians of Sunni Islam; to undermine the role of Iran within the Muslim world because they followed the Shia faith; and to defeat communism in Afghanistan and unleash a brutal war for the Soviet Union. Therefore, from the siege of Mecca to the war in Afghanistan you had a shared geopolitical interest for both America and Saudi Arabia, alongside the CIA and other security operatives, who would covertly support Islamic terrorism via Pakistan. Firm objectives and ties were being made and Pakistan would also witness Islamization under General Zia- ul-Haq and once more it is clear that America favored General Zia-ul-Haq over democratic forces in India. 

Friday, March 15, 2019

Aishwarya Rai Bachan Photos : 53 Rare HD Photos of Aishwarya Rai Bachan

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan needs no introduction.

The actress is often regarded as one of the most beautiful women in the world. She has been featured in several magazines all across the world including TIME. Her recent appearance in Ae Dil Hai Mushkil only proves that she can give tough competition to a 21-year old.  The 43-year old Aishwarya is currently prepping for Fanney Khan, which also stars Rajkummar Rao and Anil Kapoor in pivotal roles. Aishwarya is one of the most popular faces for brand endorsement in India


 The Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan love story started in the year 1999,

 when Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan were filming the movie Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. When Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan started seeing each other, people thought Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan made the loveliest pair. Later misunderstandings arose between them and they couldn’t make it. The Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan relationship didn’t end quietly. It was both a personal and legal problem. The story of Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan constantly filled gossip columns for months together.